I am blind
I cannot see.
Color is no bar to me.
I know neither
Black nor white.
I walk in night.
Yet it seems I see mankind
More tortured than the blind.
Can it be that those who know
Sight are often doomed to woe?
Or is it that, seeing,
They never see
With the infinite eyes
Of one like me?
- Langston Hughes 1902 - 1967
In case you dont know, everyone of us has a blind spot in our eyes. It is the result of an minute imperfection in the structure of the eye. (Well, i wont blame it on any intelligent creator.) This flaw occurs in the retina and is well-known point of contention between the perennially bickering evolutionist and the aspostle of ‘intelligent design’ . Well, whether you are a protagonistic evolutionist or creationist, no one can doubt the fact that “the small, circular, optically insensitive region in the retina where fibers of the optic nerve emerge from the eyeball has no rods or cones.”
Hence when light photons falls upon the area, they will go undetected.

Note: I think i gave a description in one of my previous post of the horribly complex process of how sight is achieved right from the light photons to the image we see.
Previously i was fasinated by this blind spot and would childishly ‘play’ with it. With my new found ‘poweress’ to gleefully disfigure and amputate heads and limbs of people whom i dislike from a distance. It is a curious and darn thing once you know where is it and why it happens. But its gets worse when you delve deeper into this seemingly innocous ’spot’; it heralds more than just an imperfection of the eye.
Let me give you an illustration.
source: http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/bb/blindspot1.html

Close your left eye and stare at the cross mark in the diagram with your right eye. Off to the right you should be able to see the spot. Don’t LOOK at it; just notice that it is there off to the right (if its not, move farther away from the computer screen; you should be able to see the dot if you’re a couple of feet away). Now slowly move toward the computer screen. Keep looking at the cross mark while you move. At a particular distance (probably a foot or so), the spot will disappear (it will reappear again if you move even closer). The spot disappears because it falls on the optic nerve head, the hole in the photoreceptor sheet.
My Blindspot Map

The series of blue markings are the ‘boundaries’ of my blindspot. Looks big and ominious. Heh.
Want to map your blindspot?
If you really cannot find your blind spot, perhaps this website will help you.
Once you have accquainted with your defect do have fun playing with it. However, once you get tired of it, its time to ruminate on some serious yet baffling questions about the eye and the mind.
Consider a series a test you can perform on your blind spot. Click here.

For the above test, close your right eye and slowly move towards the screen. When the blindspot is aimed at the center of the wheel, no gap is seen.
After doing the tests, one might ask, ” How does the brain know what to fill in the ‘blind spot’?”
Is it a manisfestation of a higher cognitive ability of our brain? How intelligent is this filling in process? Are they the elusive hints or clues to how our brain operates? If we move our blind spot such that it falls upon a person’s head, will it be filled with Donald Duck? George Bush?
In fact, this ‘filling in ‘ phenonmenon is not so isolated in this ‘blind spot’ test.
Take for example this picture.

[1]You will probably see a cube in the picture. No sweat. But before you dismiss this for a trick, congratulate and perhaps savour in the beauty of the inner workings of your highly sophisticated brain. (indulge in a little ego here.) Most of us have the ability to construct figures from fragmentary information. You may see a box in front of the marbles or a box behind the wall through the eight round holes. Even with limited information, the human brain is able to percieve things that are most likely to exist, even if they are not even present at all.
All these are very perplexing, but what is more interesting is when a much larger hole in your visual field - a scotoma - appears. According to a best-seller book - Phantoms in the Brain - (V.S Ramachandran, M.D., PH.D & Snadra Blakeslee), “such patients do exist and they present a valuable opportunity to study how far the brain can go in supplying the “missing information” when needed.”[2]
Some excepts from Phantoms in the Brain:
Josh was a large man with Brezhnev-like eyebrows, a barrel chest and meaty hands…Now in his early thirties, some years earlier he had suffered an industrial accident in hwich a steel rod penetrated the back of his skull, punkching a hole in his right occipital pole in the primary visual cortex. When Josh looks straight ahead, he has a blindspot about the size of my palm to the left of where he’s looking. No other part of his brain was damaged…
…First we decided to see what whould happen if we ran a little line through his scotoma, where a big piece of the visual field was missing. Would he see the line as having a gap, or would he fill it in?
But before we did the experiment, we realized we had a minor techinical problem. If we gave Josh an actual line, asked him to look straight ahead and tell us whether he saw a complete line or piece missing, he might “cheat” inadvertently… We wanted to avoid that so we simply presented Josh with 2 half lines on either side of his scotoma and asked him waht he saw. Would he see a continuous line or 2 half lines? Recall that when you tried this little experiment using your own blind spot, you saw the lins as complete.
He considered for a moment and said, “well, i see 2 lines, one above, one below and there’s a big gap in the middle.”
“okay,” I said. This was not going anywhere.
“wait!” said Josh, squinting. “Wait a minute. You know what? They’re growing toward each other.”
….He held up his right index finger vertically, pointing upward, to mimic the bottom line and his left index finger pointing downward to mimic the top line. At first the 2 fingertips were 2 inches apart, and then Josh started moving them toward each other. “They’re growing, growing.. and now there’s one complete line.” As he said this, his index fingers touched.
Not only is Josh filling in, but the filling in is happening in real time. He could watch it and describe it, contrary to claims that the phenomenon doesnt exist in people with scotomas.
Clearly some nerve circuits in Josh’s brain were taking 2 half lines, lying on either side of the scotoma, as sufficient evidence taht there is a complete line there, and these circuits are sending this message to higher centeres in Josh’s brain. So his brain could complete information across the huge, gaping hole right near his centere of gaze in much the same way that you did across your natural blind spot.
In the book, Ramachandran goes on to list a few more intriguing examples of patients who he encountered have scotomas. Some patients reportedly have “real life objects” like a car, or a book in their scotomas. Other accounts vary from one extreme to the other; like a old lady who saw cartoons in them. Others might refer them as hallucinations. According to Ramachandran, a syndrome known as the Charles Bonnet syndrome is describes the sufferer as having vivid hallucinations of “…bizarre transformations involving people with strange gazes and animals that were, flowing from his brain…”
It is perhaps a clique to say that the brain is a mysterious entity. Neurology is no less fasinating as watching meteors streak across the star-studded sky to know the brain, and its nexus of neurones, is keen to discover itself. As this century progresses i believe we will begin to understand. On the backdrop of our predecessors, we will be shocked as new discoveries and relevations are laid down on our feet; Science may have to rethink itself.
Of course, nearing the end of the 19th Century before the advent of modern day physics, many considered that the study of physics was surely a “dead science”. For it seemed to them that the basic fundamental principles governing the behaviour of the physical universe were already known. Yet, we all know today that Niels Bohr did away with Classical Physics in 1913 and postulated the Quantum Theory which inevitably gave birth to physics that would revolutionise our lives. Even a hundred years later, whenever we look at the heavens or nano-tech robots, we humble ourselves with Issac Newton’s impeccably enlightened rumination of “pebbles on the shore.”
Neuroscience will transform our train of thought in the coming decades. As one part of man probes into the physical universe, the other will yearn to look within; for the answers within us that man looks for will probably transgress any physical or chemical law or theory in the universe.
Is this a dagger which I see before me,
The handle toward my hand?
Come, let me clutch
thee:
I have thee not, and yet I see thee still.
Art thou not fatal vision, sensible
To feeling as to sight? or art thou but
A dagger fo the mind, a false creation,
Proceeding from the heat oppressed brain?
-William Shakespeare
—–
References
[1].http://www.nidek.com/marbles.html;Playing with Strange Marbles.
[2].Phantoms in the Brain - V.S Ramachandran, and Sandra Blakeslee. Chpt 5 Pg 85 Quote; Pg 97 Figure 5.7; Pg 97-99 Josh.